Workforce position & the constraint
Where do these numbers come from?
Clinical FTE — required vs supply at trend (requirement = activity index ÷ productivity)
Productivity — the collapse and the required regain
The FTE gap above is not a hiring ask. Since 2019 the workforce grew far faster
than the care it delivered — output per member of staff fell — and the recovery arithmetic only
closes if part of that lost productivity is regained. This is a working-practice problem, not a
chequebook problem: the 2020–24 expansion (+4.4%/yr FTE) did not buy matching activity.
RX1 productivity proxy — occupied bed-days per clinical FTE (index, 2019 = 100)
Staff groups
| Staff group | FTE (Apr-26) |
Growth (latest yr) | 5-yr CAGR |
Required Apr-29 | Supply Apr-29 | Gap |
FTE by staff group — long run (September snapshots + monthly from Apr-25)
The 2020–2024 expansion (+4.4%/yr total) has stopped: the latest year shows
−1.4% total FTE, concentrated in support and infrastructure roles, while the
modelled activity requirement keeps rising. Every percentage point of annual productivity
(activity per FTE) substitutes for roughly a percentage point of workforce growth.
Medical workforce detail (April 2026)
Consultants by specialty group